Winnipeg Jets

Dustin Byfuglien D 31 0 7,600 6 80 74 76 84 76 84 82 83 69 47 76 98 59 79 77 81 78

Je trouve que Byfuglien est nettement côté trop bas offensivement. Au cours des 5 dernières saisons il est comparable a Subban, Burns & Weber sur le point de vue offensif qu'il peut amener à l'équipe.
Preuve : http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/seasons/last-5-nhl-seasons-defensemen-stats.html

A titre de comparatif, voici les SH/PA/ST des trois joueurs et d'autres joueurs ayant fait moins de points que lui.
Subban: 86/88/93
Weber : 94/74/78
Burns : 90/91/90

Et si on regardes que les deux dernières saisons, il a le nombre de points comparable a :
Klingberg : 83/88/88
Doughty: 77/84/85

Blake Wheeler AD 29 0 5,600 4 77 82 81 74 75 65 76 85 78 67 68 81 33 79 80 71 77


Sérieusement Wheeler est un attaquant nettement sous estimé.
Au cours des 2 dernières saisons, il est 13e meilleur pointeur de la ligue, entouré des Stamkos, Giroux, Kopitar, Voracek, Getzlaf, Gaudreau & Pacioretty. Il a 2 buts de différence avec Gaudreau.
http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/seasons/last-2-nhl-seasons-forwards-stats.html

Wheeler : 77/80/83
Voracek : 83/93/93 (Je comprends même pas qu'il soit côté si haut...)
Kopitar : 80/87/85
Giroux : 77/90/88
Gaudreau : 78/87/84
Getzlaf : 84/90/85
Stamkos : 99/91/92

Même quand on regarde sur 5 ans, http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/seasons/last-5-nhl-seasons-forwards-stats.html
Wheeler est parmi l'élite de la LNH en fait de points, mais il demeure coté comme un joueur moyen.

Joshua Morrissey D 21 0 863 3 58 58 64 61 59 55 64 64 74 49 60 61 34 73 60 58 65
Ceilings :
SH PL ST CH PO HI SK EN PE FA LE STR FI IN
76 77 79 79 77 76 79 74 70 57 79 75 48 73

Clairement sous estimé, il est classé 23e meilleur espoir sur Hockey Future.
Potential:

Top 3 puckmoving two-way defenseman

Strengths:

Scintillating smooth and agile skater
Puck poise
Creative powerplay quarterback
Positional awareness; solid use of angles
Excellent hockey sense and IQ
Effective passing and shooting skills
Opportunistically joins the rush
Recoverability
Shiftiness and elusiveness
Adaptability
Superior level of competitiveness and work ethic; always striving to improve his game
Leadership ability
Though slightly undersized, physically capable and effective
Good use of stick on defensive side: pokechecking, etc.
Flaws/Aspects He Needs To Work On:

Continue to develop defensive acumen and add strength to handle the physical rigors of the , especially being slightly undersized.
Fantasy Hockey Potential:

Offensive = 8.5/10   Defensive = 8/10

Player(s) Comparison:

– A blend of Duncan Keith, Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Morgan Reilly, Keith Yandle and Mark Giordano

– scouts have described him as a hybrid of sorts between Kris Letang and Niklas Lidstrom.

– Morrissey patterns his game after Ryan Suter and Erik Karlsson; his favourite player is Kris Letan

Dustin Byfuglien
88 76 90
090094090088096088098084100060060090102
79 82 79 77 84 77 86 74 88 53 53 79 90
79 82
78

---

Blake Wheeler
84 90 95
075101096099090090083098098087075095090
63 84 81 83 76 76 70 82 82 73 63 80 76
83 74
80

---

Joshua Morrissey
86 78 95
040084093100090110079098085087070095080
34 72 80 86 77 95 68 84 73 75 60 82 69
79 80
79

Deux autres recotes, devraient être les dernières.

Eric Comrie (G)
Ceilings
GL BL ST PD AN AG SK EN PE RB LE STR FI IN
77 67 65 64 78 64 79 53 67 75 75 62 25 78

Sur Hockeys future : 8.0D
Hockeys writer :

ETA:

3-5 Years

Risk/Reward Analysis:

Risk: 2.5/5 Reward: 4/5

Potential:

Number one starting goalie



Strengths:

Good glove hand
Great lateral movements
Quick but efficient movements
Can read plays well
Energetic
Stays in position quite well
Quick recovery
Flaws/Aspects He Needs to Work On:

Stick Handling
Rebound Control
Fantasy Potential:

Goaltending: 9/10

Comparable:

Has drawn some comparisons to Carey Price and Semyon Varlamov.

Marko Dano
Ceilings:
SH PL ST CH PO HI SK EN PE FA LE STR FI IN
68 70 70 75 80 76 76 85 70 81 80 76 53 82

Valeur Hockey future 7.5

Hockeys writers
Risk-Reward Analysis:

Risk = 1/5 Reward = 4/5

Potential:

Top 9 forward

Strengths:

Very good skater
High level of compete
Agitating, gritty approach to the game
Excellent hockey sense and IQ
Effective passing and shooting skills
Shiftiness and elusiveness
Adaptability
Physical despite size
Do whatever it takes mentality
Flaws/Aspects He Needs To Work On:

Continue to develop defensive acumen and add strength to handle the physical rigors of the .
Fantasy Hockey Potential:

Offensive = 7.5/10 Defensive = 7.5/10

Eric Comrie 81 80 90
050099100099100100098100096096101100096
41 80 81 80 81 81 79 81 78 78 82 81 78
80 80
81

Marko Dano 75 80 90
070100100100100106101101113093108106101
53 75 75 75 75 80 76 76 85 70 81 80 76
75 77
78

Salut

Je trouvais que Laine avais été coté convenablement vs Matthews, mais de la facon que tu viens de monter Matthews, je me dois de te demande une révision de ses cotes. Certains scout services disait que c'etais serré pour le 1rst overall comme choix entre les deux...

Hockeys writer :
STRENGTHS:
Best shot in the draft
Goal scoring instincts
Physical game
Determination to score a goal
Underrated passing abilities
Can make fancy moves using his smooth hands
UNDER CONSTRUCTION (IMPROVEMENTS TO MAKE):
Skating explosiveness
Not the smoothest skater

Comparing an 18-year-old prospect with one of the best goal scorers in the might be risky, but that’s how good Patrik Laine is. His elite shot, physical game and attitude off and on the ice reminds me a lot of Washington’s number eight, Alexander Ovechkin.

comparison: Alexander Ovechkin

RISK-REWARD ANALYSIS:
Risk: 1/5   Reward: 5/5

FANTASY HOCKEY POTENTIAL:
Offensive = 10/10   Defensive = 5/10

Source : http://thehockeywriters.com/patrik-laine-the-next-ones-nhl-2016-draft-prospect-profile/

"His shot is not from this world. He can shoot anywhere, any kind of shot," says Finnish reporter Juha Hiitela, who is covering the Liiga. "But lately we've seen he's not just a sniper. He has some playmaking ability too.

Article interessant parlant de Laine qui aurait pu aller 1er overall et un scout qui dit que selon lui Laine a un potentiel plus élevé que Matthews
https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/jrhockey-buzzing-the-net/nhl-scout--%E2%80%9C-patrik--laine-has-the-biggest-upside-in-the-draft%E2%80%9D-015210279.html

Kyle Connor
Je réalise que lui aussi est sous estimé

INTERNATIONAL TOURNAMENTS:
Kyle Connor has played for Team four times and has won two gold medals. In 20 games, he’s scored nine goals and eight assists.

ETA:
1-2 years

RISK/REWARD ANALYSIS:
Risk: 1/5 Reward: 4.5/5

POTENTIAL:
1st line two-way center that plays in all scenarios (ES/PP/PK).

STRENGTHS:
Stickhandling at top speed

Acceleration
Agility

Hockey sense/IQ

Defensive awareness

Positioning

Versatile

FLAWS/ASPECTS HE NEEDS TO WORK ON:
Getting stronger

FANTASY HOCKEY POTENTIAL:
Offensive: 8/10 Defensive: 7/10

PLAYER COMPARISON:
– comparison: Jonathan Toews

Je trouve que ces ceillings representenr pas son playmaking abilities et surtout pas son talent défensif.

Merci
J'arrête après ca promi!

Patrik Laine 91 90 90
035104090100087087080100095080078088084
32 94 82 91 79 79 73 91 86 73 71 80 76
89 77
83

Kyle Connor 83 74 90
040100094102084090080102100090102100090
33 83 78 85 70 75 66 85 83 75 85 83 75
82 70
79